Adequate remedy at law
A legal remedy—often monetary damages—that is sufficient under the circumstances. Under 10 Del. C. §342, the availability of a sufficient remedy at law can limit Chancery jurisdiction.
Definitions of terms that recur in Delaware corporate, fiduciary and equity decisions. These summaries are orientation aids; the controlling definition comes from statutes and opinions in context.
A legal remedy—often monetary damages—that is sufficient under the circumstances. Under 10 Del. C. §342, the availability of a sufficient remedy at law can limit Chancery jurisdiction.
Statutory rights that may allow eligible stockholders who follow strict procedures to seek a judicial determination of the fair value of shares in certain transactions.
A deferential standard of review that, when applicable, generally presumes directors acted on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action served the corporation.
A derivative claim alleging a failure of board oversight. These claims are demanding and turn on particular allegations about board-level systems, oversight and good faith.
A person or entity that exercises control over a corporation, or in some settings a transaction, under the applicable legal test. Ownership percentage alone may not resolve control.
A lawsuit brought by a stockholder on behalf of the corporation to assert a corporate claim. Special standing and demand requirements may apply.
A claim asserting an injury to the stockholder personally, rather than an injury belonging to the corporation.
A fiduciary obligation concerning the care used in making decisions, including the information and deliberation underlying board action.
A fiduciary obligation requiring a fiduciary to act in the interests of the corporation and its stockholders rather than in pursuit of conflicting personal interests.
A demanding standard of review often applied to certain conflicted fiduciary transactions. It considers fair dealing and fair price in the context of the whole transaction.
A body of legal principles and remedies historically developed to address circumstances where ordinary legal relief may be inadequate.
A Court-approved accelerated schedule. A party must establish a basis for expedited treatment; it is not automatic.
A person entrusted with power to act for another or for an entity, who may owe duties such as loyalty and care.
A legal concept concerning honest and faithful performance of duties. Its role and relationship to fiduciary liability depend on the claim and precedent.
A court order directing a party to take or refrain from specified action. Preliminary and permanent injunctions have different requirements.
An equitable doctrine that may bar relief when an unreasonable delay in asserting a right prejudices another party. It is fact-specific.
A vote requiring approval by a majority of shares held by stockholders who are not part of a defined interested or controlling group; the precise formulation depends on the transaction and legal framework.
A framework associated with certain controller transactions conditioned from the outset on approval by an independent, empowered special committee and an informed, uncoerced majority-of-the-minority vote.
A committee of directors, typically independent, formed to evaluate or negotiate a transaction or issue involving potential conflicts. Independence, authority and process matter.
An equitable remedy requiring a party to perform a contractual obligation when legal requirements are met and damages are inadequate.
The legal framework a court applies to evaluate challenged conduct, such as business judgment, enhanced scrutiny or entire fairness.
An owner of shares in a corporation. Delaware corporate law typically uses “stockholder”; LLC statutes and agreements use “member.”
An equitable doctrine that may limit relief when the party seeking it has engaged in inequitable conduct related to the matter at issue.
A proceeding seeking access to corporate books and records under a statute or other applicable legal authority, often to investigate suspected wrongdoing or value an investment.
A group of persons that is treated together as a controlling stockholder under the definition and conditions in DGCL §144(e). The statutory definition, not a casual description of influence, controls.
Statutory procedures in 8 Del. C. §144 that can limit specified remedies for covered interested-director, officer and controlling-stockholder transactions when the detailed statutory requirements are met. It is not blanket immunity.
The statutory process by which a stockholder may seek to inspect specified corporate books and records for a proper purpose, subject to the amended statute’s scope, demand requirements and limits.
A stockholder who is not interested in the transaction in the manner specified by the governing statute or doctrine. Whether a person is disinterested depends on the facts and statutory definitions.
A heightened statutory showing under amended DGCL §220 for certain requested records outside the enumerated categories, including proof by clear and convincing evidence that records are necessary and essential.
A doctrine that may excuse a stockholder from making a litigation demand on the board before bringing a derivative action. The current Delaware framework is the universal director-by-director test adopted in Zuckerberg.
The universal director-by-director demand-futility test adopted by the Delaware Supreme Court in 2021. For each demand-board director, it asks about material personal benefit, substantial likelihood of liability, and independence from someone who did.
Senate Substitute 1 for Delaware Senate Bill 21, enacted March 25, 2025 as 85 Del. Laws ch. 6. It amended DGCL §§144 and 220 and includes transition provisions.
Try a broader phrase.
Delaware law develops through statutes and judicial decisions. A concise glossary cannot capture every qualification, exception or later change in the law.